Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts
Monday, May 14, 2012
Christian Polling Company: Americans Split on Whether Homosexuality is Sin
The Christian polling company, LifeWay Research released a poll for May 2012 which was conducted in September 2011 - not sure why it took them 8 months to run the regression models - that concludes that Americans are split on opinion of whether homosexuality is a sin. Their research indicates that 44% believe it is a sin while 43% do not believe it is a sin. Perhaps they wanted to hold off on releasing their research for a time when gay folks would start making abundant progress like we are doing now. I dont really understand why in college, we had to run regressional models for our weekly homework, but it takes 8 months for a Christian polling company to do so. Regardless, below is their presentation work - obviously biased to only highlight "Yes" responses in most of the graphs lol.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
original marriage: union of man and rib
Stephen Colbert reports on original marriage and Jesus' opinion on homosexuality. Apparently Jesus was so enraged by it, he was speechless on the matter.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Robert Spitzer pens letter of apology
Addressing the editor of Archives of Sexual Behavior Dr. Ken Zucker, Robert Spitzer writes a letter of apology concerning the study published in 2001 which claims highly motivated homosexuals can change their orientation to heterosexual. Spitzer is now retracting the study and owning up to some major research flaws. He is remorseful that anti-gay activists have misused the study to claim that people can change their sexual orientation, although the study was unable to prove so irrefutably. A portion of his letter was obtained by Truth Wins Out:
Several months ago I told you
that because of my revised view of my 2001 study of reparative therapy changing
sexual orientation, I was considering writing something that would acknowledge
that I now judged the major critiques of the study as largely correct. After
discussing my revised view of the study with Gabriel Arana, a reporter for
American Prospect, and with Malcolm Ritter, an Associated Press science writer,
I decided that I had to make public my current thinking about the study. Here
it is.
Basic Research Question. From
the beginning it was: “can some version of reparative therapy enable
individuals to change their sexual orientation from homosexual to
heterosexual?” Realizing that the study design made it impossible to answer
this question, I suggested that the study could be viewed as answering the
question, “how do individuals undergoing reparative therapy describe changes in
sexual orientation?” – a not very interesting question.
The Fatal Flaw in the Study –
There was no way to judge the credibility of subject reports of change in
sexual orientation. I offered several (unconvincing) reasons why it was
reasonable to assume that the subject’s reports of change were credible and not
self-deception or outright lying. But the simple fact is that there was no way
to determine if the subject’s accounts of change were valid.
I believe I owe the gay
community an apology for my study making unproven claims of the efficacy of
reparative therapy. I also apologize to any gay person who wasted time and
energy undergoing some form of reparative therapy because they believed that I
had proven that reparative therapy works with some “highly motivated”
individuals.
Robert Spitzer. M.D.
Emeritus Professor of
Psychiatry,
Columbia University
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Maddow reports on Robert Spitzer's retraction
According to Spitzer, the study is not scientific, but is simply a collection of anecdotes and testimonials. He is ashamed of the research being published in a scientific journal as to give the impression that it is empirical work when it is no more than self-reporting results under heavy influence from religious figures.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)